[Letter to the editor] The conundrum of the PFOA human half-life, an international collaboration

By Gloria B. Post, Linda S. Birnbaum, Jamie C. DeWitt, Helen Goeden, Wendy J. Heiger-Bernays, and Jennifer J. Schlezinger
RTP
October 1, 2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105240

Campbell et al. (2022) propose that many studies estimating the human half-life of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are significantly confounded by lack of accounting for ongoing exposures, which would inflate estimates, and by the presence of branched isomers, which could deflate estimates for linear PFOA. The authors suggest that the most accurate estimate comes from a single study, Zhang et al. (2013), of PFOA urinary clearance in the general population. However, a critical review of published human observational studies presents no such conundrum. Studies of larger, highly-exposed populations with longer follow-up periods provide reliable half-life estimates >2 years, consistent with empirical and modeled serum:drinking water ratio data not discussed herein due to space constraints. Thus, the weight of evidence strongly supports a human PFOA half-life >2 years.

 

View on ScienceDirect

View the original article here

Topics:

• ChemicalsPFAS
• Affected community
• Health
• Measurement Techniques
• Monitoring Data